Zimbabwe Chrome Mines, Claims & Ore-Supply Dashboard
Investment-screening dashboard for Zimbabwe’s Great Dyke and adjacent podiform chrome districts, covering geology, title risk, ore quality, mining methods, contractor models, logistics, acquisition structures and stage-gated validation.
1. Executive Investment View
Source-based screening; claim title, coordinates, resources and production require direct verification.Core Conclusion
Secure an option, tribute right or ore-supply agreement; verify title and geometry; complete bulk sampling and washability tests; then scale mining and beneficiation only after a smelter-approved product is demonstrated.
Low-regret entryWhat Drives Value
- Mineable continuity and mine life
- Cr₂O₃ grade and Cr/Fe ratio
- Gravity recovery and product yield
- Delivered cost to an accepting smelter
Board Position
Approve target screening and bulk testwork only. Defer mine acquisition, permanent plant EPC and smelter investment until all six investment gates are passed.
2. Priority Ore-Supply Corridors
Select a corridor from the left panel or buttons below.Corridor Investment Thesis
Key Diligence Focus
Corridor Relative Ranking
Priority Corridor Table
| Rank | Corridor | Investment interpretation |
|---|
3. National Mining District Database
| District | Province | Deposit | Mining character | Operating model | Likely smelter | Screening view |
|---|
4. Verified Large-Scale & Integrated Platforms
Zimasco Mining Network
Highest-confidence integrated platform in the public record, with locations at Shurugwi, Mashava, south of Shurugwi, Guinea Fowl, Lalapanzi, Ngezi and Mutorashanga.
- Owned/controlled mines plus contractors
- South Dyke mixed podiform and seam supply
- Middle Dyke surface and underground supply
- North Dyke predominantly underground
ZimAlloys Resource Platform
Historically extensive Great Dyke claims and tribute arrangements, but current mine-by-mine title, reserve and active-production status require direct confirmation.
- Verify current claim schedule
- Verify JORC/SAMREC resources
- Verify tribute agreements
- Quantify rehabilitation liabilities
Afrochine & Jinan/Jin An
Important smelter and buyer platforms, but public sources do not provide a reliable mine-by-mine list of captive and contracted ore sources.
- Obtain accepted ore specifications
- Confirm supplier model
- Confirm tolling or purchase openness
- Do not map unverified ownership
5. Small-Scale, Contractor & Tribute Supply Models
Commercial Models
| Model | Advantage | Principal risk |
|---|---|---|
| Tribute mining | Known geology and buyer linkage | Short tenure and buyer dependence |
| Contract mining | No mine acquisition | Equipment, productivity and payment risk |
| Independent claim | Control and upside | Title, resource and market risk |
| Ore aggregation | Fast diversified volume | Grade fraud, moisture and illegal ore |
| Local-miner JV | Local access and aligned growth | Governance and funding disputes |
Minimum Controls
- Registered title, tribute or JV documents
- Cadastral map and lawful-source verification
- Independent sampling, moisture and weighbridge controls
- Minimum-volume and quality terms
- Rehabilitation allocation and HSE audit rights
- Digital chain-of-custody and dispatch records
6. Ore Quality & Smelter Suitability
Critical Quality Parameters
| Parameter | Why it matters | Required action |
|---|---|---|
| Cr₂O₃ head grade | Contained chrome and mass pull | Representative composited assays |
| Cr/Fe ratio | Alloy grade and furnace value | Confirm smelter-specific limits |
| SiO₂ / Al₂O₃ | Slag and power consumption | Set contractual maxima |
| P / S | Potential alloy penalties | Certified assays and umpire method |
| Sizing / friability | Direct-sale and agglomeration need | Size-by-assay and degradation tests |
| Moisture | Payable dry tonnes and freight | Dry-basis pricing and calibration |
| Gravity recovery | Concentrate yield and tailings loss | Bench and pilot spiral testwork |
Minimum Testwork Package
- Model true seam width or pod geometry.
- Include dilution and weathering in the bulk sample.
- Test scrubbing, screening, spirals and magnetic separation where relevant.
- Match final products to at least two prospective smelter specifications.
- Characterise tailings and water-settling behaviour.
7. Mine Methods & Cost Drivers
The source report does not quantify transaction-specific mining costs.Mining Method Risk Matrix
| Mine type | Key cost driver | Typical failure |
|---|---|---|
| Shallow strip seam | Overburden, dilution and rehabilitation | Waste mining or seam loss |
| Underground narrow seam | Development, support and productivity | Dilution and slow advance |
| Podiform open pit | Continuity and selective mining | Unexpected pod termination |
| Small contractor | Equipment, fuel and supervision | Theft, unsafe work and irregular output |
| Alluvial/eluvial | Thickness, water and depletion | Rapid reserve exhaustion |
Correct Cost Rule
Compare the cost per recoverable tonne of contained Cr₂O₃ delivered to the smelter, including dilution, mining recovery, plant recovery, moisture and transport.
Currency Status
The source document does not provide validated acquisition prices, mine CAPEX, OPEX or per-tonne cost values. Those fields should remain unquantified until mine plans, quotes and route studies are available.
INR default · USD switch ready8. Infrastructure & Logistics Screening
Mine-to-Smelter Corridors
| Corridor | Closest node | Strength | Constraint |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shurugwi–Kwekwe | Zimasco | Short haul and strong services | Feeder-road condition |
| Lalapanzi–Gweru/Kwekwe | Multiple smelters | Choice of buyer and rail nodes | Exact route and bridge limits |
| Ngezi–Selous/Kwekwe | Afrochine / Zimasco | Large aggregation potential | Longer haul and wet season |
| Mutorashanga–Selous | Afrochine | Closer northern smelter | Underground cost and rural roads |
| Mashava–Gweru | Gweru smelters | Good trunk-road orientation | Resource continuity |
| Mberengwa–Gweru | Gweru smelters | Southern diversification | Long haul and fragmented supply |
Route Data Required
- GPS road route, not straight-line distance
- Wet- and dry-season road condition
- Bridge limits and community crossings
- Truck payload, cycle time, backhaul and fuel
- Weighbridge calibration and queue time
- Rail siding feasibility at sufficient scale
- Delivered-cost comparison to at least two smelters
9. Environmental, Social & Title Risks
Title & Encumbrance
Overlapping claims, expiry, tribute disputes and non-transferable rights.
Stop if unresolvedLand & Community
Access roads, pits and waste may affect communal or agricultural land.
Agreement requiredRehabilitation
Historic pits and disturbed ground can create liabilities larger than transaction value.
Cost before purchaseWater & Tailings
No project should proceed without a sustainable water source and acceptable discharge controls.
Hydrology gateSafety
Unsupported workings and weak contractor systems require ground-control and HSE audits.
Corporate standardTraceability
Every supplier must prove lawful source through KYC, permits and dispatch records.
Chain of custody10. Acquisition & Partnership Screening
Target Structure Comparison
| Target type | Attractiveness | Recommended structure |
|---|---|---|
| Operating mine with buyer history | High | Staged acquisition with warranties |
| Historic mine / dormant claim | Medium | Exclusive option plus drilling |
| Greenfield Great Dyke claim | Conditional | Consent-to-explore and fixed formula |
| Small-miner aggregation | High if controlled | Central buying, lab and long-term offtake |
| Tribute mining | High | Multi-year registered tribute |
| Mine + wash-plant JV | High | Pilot first, then modular plant |
Preferred Transaction Logic
11. Target Scoring Framework
Below 60/100 normally stops the transaction or returns it to exploration-only status.Weighting by Criterion
Scoring Table
| Criterion | Weight | Pass evidence |
|---|
12. Recommended 90-Day Field Programme
| Period | Action | Decision output |
|---|---|---|
| Days 1–15 | Shortlist 10–15 targets, obtain title references and seller terms. | Reject unverifiable titles. |
| Days 15–30 | Cadastral checks, site reconnaissance, GPS logistics and community screening. | Fatal-flaw and route-cost screen. |
| Days 30–50 | Channel/stockpile sampling and historic-data audit. | Grade and variability view. |
| Days 50–70 | Bulk sample, washability tests and two smelter/transport quotes. | Recovery, yield and delivered-value model. |
| Days 70–85 | Preliminary mine plan, financial inputs, rehabilitation and transaction negotiation. | Downside investment case. |
| Days 85–90 | Investment-committee review and option/JV/tribute term sheet. | Proceed, drill, renegotiate or reject. |
13. Final Decision & Investment Gates
Recommended Business Model
- Reduces dependence on one uncertain claim.
- Builds scale through contractors and tributors.
- Improves blending and grade control.
- Reduces raw-ore/concentrate export-policy exposure.
- Preserves the option for later smelter integration.
Six Investment Gates
| Gate | Proceed only if |
|---|---|
| 1. Legal | Title or tribute rights are bankable and dispute-free. |
| 2. Resource | Drilling supports adequate tonnes and mine life. |
| 3. Product | Bulk test delivers a smelter-acceptable product. |
| 4. Margin | Mine, wash and transport costs leave downside margin. |
| 5. ESG | Water, land, closure and community risks are manageable. |
| 6. Offtake | Written buyer or toll terms precede major plant CAPEX. |